Recent Posts
  Has the Rainbow Flag Become Too Gay?
  Five Years Ago Today
  'Hate Crimes' Justice
  'Ex-Gay' in San Francisco
  Concerned Women for America: God's Army?
  ... and Lesbian Birds
  Sunday Read
  Merry Christmas!
  Bishop Cecil Riley on Homosexuality
  YMCA 'Restores Integrity' after Tranny Brawl
  Southern Baptists Struggle to 'Preserve Unity'
  Alabama State Rep. Gerald Allen Speaks
  Tafel on a Tear
  'Safe Space' Stickers Cross the Line
  Criminal Hate Speech
  HRC By The Numbers
  Rites of Passage
  What Would Jesus Do?
  Comments
  Equality In The States

Grantham Categories
  "W" is For Wackos  (40)
  2004 Debates  (32)
  Barnyard  (1)
  Campaign Madness  (41)
  Catastrophic Success  (33)
  Coming Out  (12)
  Email  (4)
  Equal Marriage Rights  (50)
  Exclusives  (17)
  Fact Check  (2)
  Flip-Flops  (11)
  For The Record  (51)
  Free Speech  (28)
  Fuzzy Math  (6)
  Gay Vague  (1)
  Gay Vote  (14)
  Internet Regulation  (1)
  Media  (49)
  Moral Majority  (61)
  Political Subterfuge  (38)
  Polls  (35)
  Scandal  (26)
  Sunday Read  (16)
  White House Press Briefing  (15)

Grantham Archives
  December 2004
  November 2004
  October 2004
  September 2004
  August 2004
  July 2004
  June 2004
  May 2004
  April 2004
  March 2004
  February 2004
  January 2004
  December 2003
  November 2003
  October 2003

Links

  Vote for this blog
  Blogroll Me!

op-ed
Christian Grantham was a student activist in the late 90s and later was a consultant to domestic policy forums for the Clinton Administration as well as events for HRC and GLAAD.

  latest posts

CAMPAIGN MADNESS: Lawyers, Lawyers, Lawyers Edition

November 01, 2004

Why spend four years trying to improve the rights of voters when you can hire thousands of lawyers for one day to challenge the rights of Democratic voters in a broke system?

In Ohio alone, more than 3,000 Republican lawyers were set to challenge the rights of voters, until a U.S. District Judge said no.

The judge was asked to stop more than 3,000 Republicans who are planning to monitor polling places and challenge voters.

U.S. District Judge Susan Dlott found that the presence of challengers inexperienced in the electoral process would impede voting.

She ruled that application of Ohio's statute allowing challengers at polling places is unconstitutional.
[Judge Rules Polling Place Challengers Unconstitutional - AP - 11-01-04]

filed under: Campaign Madness