Recent Posts
  Has the Rainbow Flag Become Too Gay?
  Five Years Ago Today
  'Hate Crimes' Justice
  'Ex-Gay' in San Francisco
  Concerned Women for America: God's Army?
  ... and Lesbian Birds
  Sunday Read
  Merry Christmas!
  Bishop Cecil Riley on Homosexuality
  YMCA 'Restores Integrity' after Tranny Brawl
  Southern Baptists Struggle to 'Preserve Unity'
  Alabama State Rep. Gerald Allen Speaks
  Tafel on a Tear
  'Safe Space' Stickers Cross the Line
  Criminal Hate Speech
  HRC By The Numbers
  Rites of Passage
  What Would Jesus Do?
  Comments
  Equality In The States

Grantham Categories
  "W" is For Wackos  (40)
  2004 Debates  (32)
  Barnyard  (1)
  Campaign Madness  (41)
  Catastrophic Success  (33)
  Coming Out  (12)
  Email  (4)
  Equal Marriage Rights  (50)
  Exclusives  (17)
  Fact Check  (2)
  Flip-Flops  (11)
  For The Record  (51)
  Free Speech  (28)
  Fuzzy Math  (6)
  Gay Vague  (1)
  Gay Vote  (14)
  Internet Regulation  (1)
  Media  (49)
  Moral Majority  (61)
  Political Subterfuge  (38)
  Polls  (35)
  Scandal  (26)
  Sunday Read  (16)
  White House Press Briefing  (15)

Grantham Archives
  December 2004
  November 2004
  October 2004
  September 2004
  August 2004
  July 2004
  June 2004
  May 2004
  April 2004
  March 2004
  February 2004
  January 2004
  December 2003
  November 2003
  October 2003

Links

  Vote for this blog
  Blogroll Me!

op-ed
Christian Grantham was a student activist in the late 90s and later was a consultant to domestic policy forums for the Clinton Administration as well as events for HRC and GLAAD.

  latest posts

Double Standards on Free Speech

October 16, 2004

Josh Marshall, of Talking Points Memo, doesn't always have a problem with censorship.

It's not a 'fairness' or a free speech issue. It's a massive and quite public case of election and campaign finance fraud. It's the sort of thing that, if it happens, will put the legitimacy of the entire election into doubt.
[Too generous - Talking Points Memo - 10-11-04]

But sometimes he does.

This move, if you think about it, is extraordinary. In a political campaign there are very few forms of political speech -- judged by content -- that should ever be subject to legal proceedings. But to threaten legal action to squelch discussion of a subject that is obviously a very newsworthy and relevant issue -- and one the country could face in the next four years -- is simply astonishing. [Talking Points Memo - 10-15-04]

In the first instance, Marshall was talking about Sinclair airing an anti-Kerry documentary. In the second instance, he was talking about another double standard, this time from the RNC's cease and desist letter sent to Rock The Vote. This is the problem with not maintaining a consistent view on censorship and freedom of speech.

The Republican National Committee has presented quite an audacious case for censoring political free speech when they demanded Rock The Vote stop discussing the draft.

Yet, as you must be aware, this urban myth regarding a draft has been thoroughly debunked by no less than the President of the United States, who explicitly stated, 'We don't need the draft. Look, the all-volunteer Army is working..." as well as the Vice President, who explained, "And the notion that somebody's peddling out there that there is a secret plan to reinstitute the draft, hogwash, not true." Additionally, the Secretary of Defense, "heatedly denied yesterday that the military plans to bring back the draft and boost reserves and National Guard call-ups after the November election. 'That is absolute nonsense,' [Donald] Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee. 'It's absolutely false that anyone in this administration is considering reinstituting the draft.'"
[Letter to Rock The Vote - RNC - 10-13-04 - (view PDF)]

Aside from the free spech issue, it is astonishing the RNC presents President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld as credible people on the issue of troop levels in Iraq.

filed under: Free Speech