Recent Posts
  Virginia, November 2005
  Conservative Agenda Abandons the Welfare of Foster Children
  Roilling the Flames of Hell
  Integrity in Gay Media
  Accountability
  Mini-Vans vs. Noisy Red Ferraris
  Rev. Al Sharpton on 'Moral Values'
  'Happy Birthday To Me'
  Sunday Read
  The Point Foundation
  Trimming The Fat
  'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' is hurting America
  Pentagon Weapon: Homosexual Spray?
  FACT CHECK: Southern Voice on HRC
  Michael Bronski on Sontag
  Jacques Slams 'Minority of Voices' at HRC
  Some Activists Troubled by HRC's Process
  Cheryl Jacques Launches Website
  Outing Sontag: Obit Drama Escalates
  Did Alberto Gonzales Condone Torture Techniques?

Grantham Categories
  "W" is For Wackos  (40)
  2004 Debates  (32)
  Barnyard  (1)
  Campaign Madness  (41)
  Catastrophic Success  (33)
  Coming Out  (12)
  Email  (4)
  Equal Marriage Rights  (52)
  Exclusives  (17)
  Fact Check  (3)
  Flip-Flops  (11)
  For The Record  (51)
  Free Speech  (30)
  Fuzzy Math  (6)
  Gay Vague  (1)
  Gay Vote  (14)
  Giving  (1)
  Internet Regulation  (1)
  Media  (54)
  Moral Majority  (65)
  Political Subterfuge  (38)
  Polls  (35)
  Scandal  (28)
  Sunday Read  (18)
  White House Press Briefing  (15)

Grantham Archives
  January 2005
  December 2004
  November 2004
  October 2004
  September 2004
  August 2004
  July 2004
  June 2004
  May 2004
  April 2004
  March 2004
  February 2004
  January 2004
  December 2003
  November 2003
  October 2003

Links

  Vote for this blog
  Blogroll Me!

christian grantham
Christian Grantham was a student activist in the late 90s and later was a consultant to domestic policy forums for the Clinton Administration as well as events for HRC and GLAAD.

  latest posts

Gay Republicans withhold support for Bush's re-election

April 19, 2004

The Republican National Convention, scheduled August 30, 2004 in New York City, will host a spectacular display of issues being protested outside the convention. But one issue that will dominate the convention inside the platform committee will be equal marriage rights for gays.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie has already promised to fortify anti-gay positions in the party's platform, calling tolerance for equal rights, "religious bigotry." Gillespie's rhetoric on the issue is a divisive clarion call to a religiously fanatic conservative base eager to divide America. The support of gay Republicans in 2000 is of no consequence to a Republican base determined to make constitutional protections a matter of exclusivity.

Ever since President Bush lent his voice to divisive forces seeking a constitutional amendment denying equal marriage rights to gays, President Bush has steadily lost the support of gay Republicans. That might seem not much of a loss, but when you consider reports by Voter News Service's 2000 exit polling, more than 1,000,000 gay Republicans voted for President Bush. The margin was enough to give Bush a slim victory in Florida.

Not only has the nation's largest group for gay Republicans, Log Cabin Republicans, refused to endorse President Bush, the campaign for re-election is losing its closest gay supporters. Several of the original "Austin 12," a group of openly gay advisors to the Bush's 2000 presidential campaign, are expressing reservations over whether they will support Bush in 2004. Openly gay Republican Party Platform Committee member and one of the Austin 12, David Catania, has promised to draw attention to any attempt by the committee to support a constitutional amendment denying equal marriage rights to gay Americans.

In today's San Francisco Examiner, AP's Sara Kugler sheds some light on this growing story.

Here is what the current party platforms say about equal rights for gay Americans:

REPUBLICAN PARTY PLATFORM (2000)
We support the traditional definition of "marriage" as the legal union of one man and one woman, and we believe that federal judges and bureaucrats should not force states to recognize other living arrangements as marriages.

DEMOCRATIC PARTY PLATFORM (2000)
We support continued efforts ...to end workplace discrimination against gay men and lesbians. We support the full inclusion of gay and lesbian families in the life of the nation. This would include an equitable alignment of benefits.

filed under: